Understanding Legal Distinctions: Breach of Promise vs False Promise of Marriage
In a significant legal ruling, the MP High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a man, shedding light on the nuanced difference between breach of promise and false promise of marriage.
Case Overview
The petitioner, Amar Singh Rajput, faced charges under Sections 376(2)(N), 506, and 34 of the IPC based on an FIR lodged by the prosecutrix. The woman alleged that despite being in a relationship with the petitioner, he assaulted her, leading to the filing of the FIR.
Legal Analysis
The court examined the nature of the relationship between the petitioner and the prosecutrix. It was revealed that they were in a relationship from 2020 to 2021, during which the prosecutrix stayed with the petitioner in Seondha. The woman claimed that the petitioner refused to marry her, leading to the altercation on July 10, 2021.
Court’s Decision
The court deliberated on the distinction between mere breach of promise and giving a false promise to marry. It emphasized that only a false promise made with the intention to deceive would vitiate consent, while a mere breach of promise cannot be equated with a false promise.
Given the circumstances of the case, where the prosecutrix continued the relationship despite the alleged breach of promise, the court concluded that it was not a case of false promise to marry. Therefore, the prosecution against the petitioner was deemed an abuse of legal process.
Conclusion
With this ruling, the MP High Court clarifies the legal nuances surrounding breach of promise and false promise of marriage, providing insight into the complexities of consent and legal liability.
Be a part our social media community:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/IndianMan.in?mibextid=ZbWKwL
Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/indianman.in?igsh=MWZ2N3N0ZmpwM3l3cw==
