The Bombay High Court has ordered the release of a man confined in a rehabilitation centre on his wife’s instructions, stating that no medical records justified the detention.
The Rajasthan High Court ruled that a married woman can choose to live with her lover if she wishes, stating that adult women cannot be treated as property or forced to stay in a marriage against their will.
The Patna High Court refused to hand over a minor wife to her husband, citing child marriage laws. The husband must open a bank account and deposit money for their newborn’s welfare.
The Bombay High Court ruled that a man forcibly kept in a rehab center by his wife due to marital issues must be released, as there was no medical justification for his detention.
The Rajasthan High Court ruled that a married woman has the right to live with her lover if she chooses, dismissing her husband’s habeas corpus petition and affirming that no adult woman can be forced to stay in a relationship against her will.
The Gujarat High Court ruled in favor of a woman’s right to choose her path, stating that as an adult, she can make her own decisions. The ruling followed a petition filed by her live-in partner seeking her custody.
The Bombay High Court ordered the release of a man who was forcibly detained in a rehab center by his wife, citing the absence of medical evidence to justify his stay. The court found that the man’s detention was based solely on his wife’s orders amid marital issues.
The Karnataka High Court directed the police to ensure a mother hands over custody of her child to the father and ordered her employer to withhold her pay for failing to comply with a judicial order.
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a father is entitled to visitation rights to meet his son who lives with his mother. The court set a visitation schedule allowing the father to visit once a month and on specific holidays.
The Karnataka High Court directed police to request an employer to withhold the pay of a woman who failed to transfer child custody to her husband, despite a judicial order. The court emphasized the abuse of legal process in this case.
