
Court Denies Maintenance to Woman Earning More Than Husband
A Mumbai court refused to grant maintenance to a woman earning more than her husband. However, it ordered the husband to pay child support despite his denial of paternity.
A Mumbai court refused to grant maintenance to a woman earning more than her husband. However, it ordered the husband to pay child support despite his denial of paternity.
In a rare divorce case, a Pune court has ordered a woman to pay Rs 50,000 as permanent alimony to her husband, emphasizing the importance of transparency in legal proceedings.
The Delhi High Court has emphasized the need to curb false rape charges in matrimonial cases that are later settled. The court quashed an FIR involving charges under Section 376 IPC, highlighting the misuse of legal provisions.
A Delhi court refused maintenance to an MBA graduate wife, citing her ability to earn and discouraging willful unemployment and dependency on her husband.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld a divorce, ruling that a wife forcing her husband to live separately from his parents led to an irretrievable breakdown of marriage. The husband was ordered to pay Rs 15 lakh as alimony.
The Karnataka High Court declared a marriage void after ruling that the wife misrepresented her age and health condition at the time of marriage, obtaining consent through fraud.
The Bombay High Court ruled that a man cannot escape paying maintenance to his estranged wife and children, even if he is facing financial difficulties.
The Bombay High Court ruled that a wife cannot prevent her husband from selling a flat if he offers similar alternative housing. The court upheld the family court’s decision, balancing the rights of both parties.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a man’s plea seeking an Income Tax investigation into his wife’s family over a ₹2 crore dowry claim. The court ruled that the complaint arose from a marital dispute and did not violate any statutory rights.
The Karnataka High Court ruled that a wife cannot be charged with extortion for seeking maintenance through the court. The court quashed complaints filed by both spouses, citing a lack of evidence for cruelty or false claims.