
Delhi High Court Quashes FIR After Rs 74 Lakh Matrimonial Settlement
Delhi High Court quashes FIR under Section 377 IPC after husband pays Rs 74 lakh to settle matrimonial disputes. The court stressed amicable resolution for a fresh start.
Delhi High Court quashes FIR under Section 377 IPC after husband pays Rs 74 lakh to settle matrimonial disputes. The court stressed amicable resolution for a fresh start.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that in matrimonial cases, the husband’s convenience takes priority when he has custody of minor children. The court directed the husband to bear the wife’s travel expenses to attend court proceedings.
The Madras High Court advises estranged couples to foster empathy and hospitality during child visitation, emphasizing the importance of a supportive environment for the child’s well-being.
The Allahabad High Court granted a father visitation rights to meet his son, ensuring monthly and festive visits while maintaining peace during interactions.
The Kerala High Court has ruled that refusing divorce in a failed marriage can amount to mental cruelty. The judgment stresses that irreconcilable differences and emotional distress justify legal separation.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that a mother coaching her daughter to speak against her father amounts to mental cruelty, upholding a divorce petition filed by the father. The court highlighted the harmful effects of parental alienation in such cases.
The Kerala High Court ruled that a mother’s societal morality does not necessarily impact her ability to provide for her child’s welfare, granting shared custody in a case where the family court had favored the father.
The Karnataka High Court directed the police to ensure a mother hands over custody of her child to the father and ordered her employer to withhold her pay for failing to comply with a judicial order.
The Supreme Court quashed an FIR lodged against a father for taking his son from the mother’s custody. The court emphasized the need to consider the child’s welfare in custody disputes and directed the father to provide financial support.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that when a husband has custody of minor children, his convenience should be prioritized in matrimonial cases. The Court rejected the wife’s request to transfer the case, ensuring the husband’s responsibility for travel expenses.