Path: Home » NEWS against MEN » Divorce » No Bigamy If Second Marriage Occurs During Pending Divorce Appeal: Kerala High Court

No Bigamy If Second Marriage Occurs During Pending Divorce Appeal: Kerala High Court

Key Judgment

The Kerala High Court recently ruled that entering a second marriage while an appeal against a divorce decree is pending does not amount to bigamy under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) if the appeal is eventually dismissed. Justice P. Somarajan, who delivered the verdict, clarified that once a divorce decree is upheld on appeal, the second marriage is considered valid from the date of the original decree.

Background of the Case

In this case, a woman accused her husband of bigamy, alleging he married another woman while the appeal against their divorce was still pending. The man was charged under Sections 494, 114, and 34 of the IPC. However, he argued that his second marriage was lawful as it took place after the Family Court granted a divorce, even though the appeal was pending.

The court emphasized that for bigamy to be established, certain conditions must be met:

  1. The accused must have a valid first marriage.
  2. The second marriage must occur while the first marriage is still legally valid.
  3. The spouse from the first marriage must be alive.

Legal Basis

The court referenced Gopal Lal v. State of Rajasthan [AIR 1979 (SC) 713], which holds that a second marriage is void if it takes place during the lifetime of a first spouse. Additionally, the court highlighted Section 15 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which allows a divorced person to remarry after a decree of divorce, provided there is no pending appeal or the appeal is dismissed.

The court further clarified that the effectiveness of a divorce decree dates back to the original decree issued by the Family Court, not the appellate decision. Thus, if the appeal is dismissed, the second marriage is valid from the date of the Family Court’s decree.

Final Verdict

The High Court ruled in favor of the husband, dismissing the charges of bigamy. It concluded that since the divorce decree was upheld on appeal, the second marriage did not violate any laws.

Be a part our social media community:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/IndianMan.in?mibextid=ZbWKwL
Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/indianman.in?igsh=MWZ2N3N0ZmpwM3l3cw==

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *