A recent court ruling in Ahmedabad cleared a bank employee accused of rape under false pretenses of marriage, stating that a rape case cannot be used to force a man to keep his marriage promise.
Discover the shocking Supreme Court ruling on a 25-year separation divorce case that challenges Indian society’s views on marriage and divorce. Dive into the controversial verdict and join the conversation now!
Explore the Narendra vs K. Meena case as we discuss the alleged bias against men in Indian matrimonial law, the emotional toll faced by men in matrimonial disputes, and the importance of gender-neutral laws for a fair legal system.
The Supreme Court overturned the trial court’s decision, granting a decree of judicial separation instead of divorce. The Court held that while Vinny had proven cruelty on the part of her husband, she had not established the requisite ‘irretrievable breakdown of marriage’ needed for a divorce. Furthermore, the Court maintained that a divorce would cause undue hardship to Parmvir
The husband sought relief from the alleged mental cruelty inflicted by his wife, but the legal system seemed to favor the wife.
Divorce denied to husband even when he proved that wife was not staying with husband -www.Indianman.in
Discover the emotional and social turmoil faced by Indian men who are wrongly accused under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, and learn how these false allegations are tearing families apart.
In August 2015, Jasleen Kaur, a young woman from Delhi, accused Sarabjit Singh of harassment and molestation during a road rage incident. She posted Singh’s photo on social media, which quickly went viral and led to his arrest. The case became a prime example of how quickly a man’s life can be upended by false accusations.
During a court hearing, the woman admitted to making up the charges, leading to the man’s acquittal. This case caught the media’s attention and sparked a conversation about the implications of false accusations.
