The Delhi High Court ruled that occasional adultery does not amount to “living in adultery” under Section 125(4) CrPC, allowing a wife to claim maintenance. The court emphasized the need for continuous adultery to refuse maintenance.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that a husband cannot seek divorce by claiming he wants to serve his parents, stressing the sacred and lifelong nature of marriage under Hindu law.
The Supreme Court rejected a married daughter’s claim for compassionate appointment, ruling that under Madhya Pradesh’s rules, the surviving spouse must nominate a child for the job.
The Allahabad High Court granted a father visitation rights to meet his son, ensuring monthly and festive visits while maintaining peace during interactions.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that a wife’s deliberate attempts to harm her husband’s career and reputation amount to mental cruelty, providing grounds for divorce.
The Supreme Court emphasized that maintenance should provide financial stability without being punitive. In Rajnesh vs. Neha, the court outlined guidelines for determining fair alimony, ensuring transparency between spouses.
The Kerala High Court ruled that refusing treatment for mental health issues, which harms marital harmony, constitutes cruelty. Learn more about this case and its implications on divorce laws.
The Bombay High Court has ruled that under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, either spouse, including a husband, can claim alimony. This judgment emphasizes the law’s focus on supporting indigent spouses.
The Madras High Court has granted a man divorce on the grounds of cruelty, ruling that forcing a spouse to live beyond their means and inviting debt is a form of mental cruelty. This decision overturns a previous family court ruling.
