The Supreme Court has acquitted a man in a 26-year-old dowry and cruelty case, highlighting how Section 498A IPC is often misused in family disputes. The Court stressed the need for solid evidence and cautioned against implicating entire families without proof.
The Rajasthan High Court has reduced the death penalty of a man wrongly convicted for the rape and murder of a 7-year-old girl, ordering a fresh investigation after key evidence pointed to false implication.
After spending 20 years in prison for a rape case based on false charges, Vishnu Tiwari, now 43, struggles to begin life again with no family, education, or future. The NHRC has taken note of this injustice.
The Bombay High Court criticized the police and judges for failing to properly examine evidence, leading to a wrongful conviction. The court has ordered corrective action to improve judicial training.
The Delhi High Court criticized the police for falsely accusing a father and grandmother in a 2-year-old’s death. The court found no evidence against them and warned against careless legal appeals.
The Supreme Court of India acquitted a man accused of murdering his wife 22 years ago, citing lack of concrete evidence and reliance on suspicion. The case highlights the importance of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
A woman who was declared dead seven years ago in Uttar Pradesh was recently found alive and married. Meanwhile, a man had been serving a jail sentence for her “murder.” The police have now reopened the case to establish the truth.
The Supreme Court acquitted a man sentenced to death for a 2012 rape and murder case due to lack of evidence. The case highlights police negligence and judicial oversights, raising questions about justice in India.
Habil Sindhu, wrongfully convicted of a triple murder, was freed after spending 19 years in jail. The court found no evidence against him, bringing long-awaited justice.
The Rajasthan High Court commuted the death penalty of a man falsely implicated in the rape and murder of a 7-year-old. The court cited circumstantial evidence and DNA mismatches as key reasons to order a fresh investigation.
