he Supreme Court has quashed an FIR against a father for taking his son from the mother’s custody, focusing on the child’s best interests and the proper use of legal resources.
Supreme Court Justice DY Chandrachud underscores the necessity for a shift in how lawyers operate in the apex court, urging against frequent adjournments that delay proceedings and impact judicial efficiency.
The Supreme Court has quashed a rape case, emphasizing the difference between false promises of marriage and breaches made in good faith. This decision, based on a consensual relationship, underscores the court’s approach to legal matters in such cases.
The Supreme Court has directed that convicts who have served 10 years of their sentence should be granted bail if their appeals are not scheduled for a hearing soon. This move aims to declutter jails and ensure justice.
The Supreme Court’s recent decision has expanded the definition of rape under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act to include marital rape, emphasizing women’s rights and access to medical termination services in cases of sexual assault within marriage.
The Supreme Court stressed the importance of maintaining discipline within the armed forces regarding adultery cases, stating that such conduct can profoundly affect officers’ lives and family units. Explore the court’s perspective and its implications for disciplinary proceedings in the military.
The Supreme Court declared that an able-bodied husband must earn legitimately to support his wife and minor child. This ruling reinforces the husband’s duty to provide financial support and prevent destitution.
The Supreme Court has acquitted a UP man after 10 years in jail due to lack of evidence in a rape and murder case, highlighting serious flaws in police investigation and judicial proceedings.
The Supreme Court of India stresses that marriage is a serious commitment, urging couples to try mediation before deciding on separation. The court underscores that marriage should not be treated casually.
The Supreme Court ruled against a Jharkhand High Court order requiring a husband to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs for pre-arrest bail in a 498A case, stating it was unjustifiable.
