The Bombay High Court ruled that domestic violence complaints cannot be filed in locations where the complainant is merely a visitor, citing concerns over potential misuse of the legal process.
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a woman can seek relief under the DV Act even after her marriage is declared null and void, upholding her rights as an aggrieved person in a domestic relationship.
The Delhi High Court ruled that husbands cannot seek protection under the Domestic Violence Act, which is intended to safeguard women from abuse. The ruling reinforces the Act’s focus on protecting women from domestic violence.
A daughter-in-law forcibly re-enters her marital home after a failed Rs 13 lakh settlement, leading to a tense standoff with her in-laws. Learn about the ongoing legal battles and escalating demands.
The Calcutta High Court has ruled that denying financial support to a wife and her minor son amounts to domestic violence under the DV Act, 2005, even if the husband and wife live separately. This decision underscores the significance of economic support in safeguarding the rights of women and children.
The Bombay High Court clarified that a woman who vacates her matrimonial home before divorce proceedings cannot assert the right to residence under the DV Act, despite any pending appeal. Discover the details of the court’s decision and its impact on matrimonial disputes.
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a woman’s application under the Domestic Violence Act remains valid even if her marriage is declared null and void. This decision reinforces the protection available to women in domestic relationships.
