A Delhi court ruled that a wife capable of earning cannot remain idle and burden her husband financially. The court ordered the husband to pay Rs 12,000 per month for one year, during which the wife should actively seek employment.
A Delhi court acquitted a man accused of rape after examining WhatsApp chats that contradicted the woman’s allegations. The chats revealed a consensual and friendly relationship, undermining the claims of sexual assault.
The Delhi court ruled that an unemployed husband is still responsible for paying maintenance to his wife, stating that losing a job doesn’t absolve him of his financial duties or the ability to find new employment.
A Delhi court has ordered a woman to pay Rs. 15 lakh to her ex-husband for defamation, citing harm to his reputation and professional life through false accusations and emails.
A Delhi court has ordered an FIR against a woman and her father for falsely accusing her husband and in-laws of gang rape and cruelty. The court highlighted the misuse of legal provisions and called for firm action against false accusations.
A Delhi court denied maintenance to an MBA graduate, ruling that she is fully capable of earning for herself, and that the law does not encourage willful unemployment or dependency on a husband.
In a significant ruling, a Delhi court awarded interim custody of two young children to their father, emphasizing that the welfare of the children must come before the personal choices of the mother.
A Delhi court has refused to grant maintenance to Shiny Verma Bakshi, an MBA graduate, citing her qualifications and ability to find employment. The court emphasized that maintenance is not an absolute right and highlighted her capacity to support herself.
A Delhi court acquitted a man after six years of trial in a false rape case. The court found the woman’s statements unreliable and evidence showed she had a consensual relationship with the accused.
A Delhi court acquitted a man falsely accused of sexually assaulting minors, awarding him 1 lakh in compensation. The court noted that the accusations were a result of caste hatred and directed the state to compensate the man.
