The Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that live-in couples, even when one partner is married, are entitled to protection from threats. The court upheld the right to personal autonomy in such relationships, highlighting legal safeguards despite societal norms.
The Delhi High Court deemed virginity tests on women as sexist and unconstitutional, emphasizing that these tests violate the right to dignity. The court ruled that such practices reinforce gender stereotypes and have no medical basis.
The Supreme Court has issued a notice in a petition challenging the marital rape exception under Indian law. The petitioner, Ruth Manorama, argues that this exception violates fundamental constitutional rights, particularly affecting Dalit women.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that live-in couples, even if one partner is married, are entitled to legal protection. The Court emphasized personal autonomy and the welfare of minor children, urging alternative legal mechanisms to address such cases.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has noted that live-in relationships are leading to a rise in sexual offences, citing this while rejecting a bail plea for a man accused of rape.
The MP High Court ruled that requiring a husband to provide his salary slip in a maintenance case does not violate his privacy or liberty, ensuring fair adjudication in support cases.
The Karnataka High Court has directed the state to pay ₹5 lakhs as compensation to Ningaraju N for his wrongful arrest due to identity confusion.
The Delhi High Court has condemned virginity tests as sexist and unconstitutional, stating they violate women’s dignity and human rights. This landmark judgment highlights the need to uphold fundamental rights and eliminate discriminatory practices.
