Path: Home » NEWS against MEN » 498A/ Domestic Violence » Bombay High Court Highlights Misuse of Section 498A, Quashes Case Against Distant Relative

Bombay High Court Highlights Misuse of Section 498A, Quashes Case Against Distant Relative

Bombay High Court Criticizes Section 498A Misuse, Protects Distant Relatives

The Bombay High Court recently addressed the growing misuse of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, which deals with cruelty by a husband or his relatives. The court quashed a domestic violence case against Jyoti Patil, a distant relative of the accused husband, who was living separately and had no connection to the alleged incidents.

Case Background

Justice Vibha Kankanwadi presided over the case, where the complainant-wife accused her husband’s family, including Patil, of domestic violence. Patil, a veterinarian residing in Bhusawal, lived far from the complainant and her husband, who were based in Pune. Despite this, Patil was named in the case solely because of her relationship with the husband.

Court’s Observations

Justice Kankanwadi strongly criticized the practice of including all of the husband’s relatives in such complaints.

  • The court noted that it has become common to falsely accuse distant relatives, even those who have no involvement or proximity to the married couple.
  • “Poor relatives who have never stayed with the husband cannot be dragged into legal proceedings based on stray statements,” the judge remarked.

The court emphasized that such misuse of the law causes undue harassment and wastes judicial resources.

Flawed Allegations

The complainant herself admitted in her complaint that Patil lived separately in Bhusawal. The court found no evidence or documentation to show that Patil had ever stayed with the couple in a shared household.

The judge stated, “Basic pleadings and evidence are lacking. Without such proof, it is unfair to ask the accused to face prolonged legal proceedings.”

Final Verdict

In light of these observations, the court invoked its inherent powers to quash the proceedings against Patil, ruling that she could not be subjected to legal action based on unsupported allegations.

Key Takeaway

The judgment sheds light on the frequent misuse of Section 498A, especially against distant relatives. It underscores the importance of verifying allegations before initiating legal action, protecting individuals from baseless harassment.

Be a part our social media community:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/IndianMan.in?mibextid=ZbWKwL
Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/indianman.in?igsh=MWZ2N3N0ZmpwM3l3cw==

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *