Path: Home » NEWS against MEN » Rape Case » Karnataka HC Verdict on Marital Rape Sparks Mixed Reactions Amid Ongoing Delhi HC Case

Karnataka HC Verdict on Marital Rape Sparks Mixed Reactions Amid Ongoing Delhi HC Case

The recent Karnataka High Court ruling that a man cannot avoid trial for rape simply because the victim is his wife has sparked diverse reactions. This landmark decision, issued on March 23, addressed the marital rape exception under Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and emphasized the principle of equality before the law.

Feminist groups have welcomed the ruling as a progressive step toward recognizing women’s rights within marriage. Advocate Raghav Awasthi, representing organizations like RIT Foundation and All India Democratic Women’s Association in a related case in the Delhi High Court, expressed optimism. “This is a welcome step, and we hope it brings more awareness in the country,” he said.

However, men’s rights activists voiced concerns about the judgment’s broader implications. Amit Lakhani, representing the Men’s Welfare Trust, called the verdict “dangerous” and warned it could lead to misuse. He argued, “This judgment might pave the way for another draconian law that can be exploited in failed marriages, leaving husbands vulnerable to false accusations and irreversible damages, even after acquittal.”

The Karnataka High Court also urged lawmakers to address inequalities in the legal framework, noting that such disparities violate the constitutional right to equality. The verdict called for a reassessment of laws to ensure justice for all, acknowledging the silent voices of victims within marriage.

The central government, however, remains cautious. While it initially opposed criminalizing marital rape in 2017, citing concerns about destabilizing marriages, it has since stated that it is re-evaluating its position. Officials noted that any decision on this sensitive issue would require consultation with state governments and stakeholders, as the potential impact on family life could be significant.

Petitioners challenging the marital rape exception argue that the provision discriminates against married women by denying them protection against sexual violence by their husbands. This issue is currently under review in the Delhi High Court, with growing calls for legislative and judicial clarity on the matter.

The Karnataka High Court’s ruling has intensified the debate, reflecting the complexity of balancing legal reforms, societal values, and individual rights in modern India.

Be a part our social media community:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/IndianMan.in?mibextid=ZbWKwL
Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/indianman.in?igsh=MWZ2N3N0ZmpwM3l3cw==

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *