Madhya Pradesh High Court Modifies Judgment on Rape Convict’s Sentence
The Madhya Pradesh High Court revised its judgment, removing the controversial remark that described a rape convict as “kind enough” for not killing the survivor.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court revised its judgment, removing the controversial remark that described a rape convict as “kind enough” for not killing the survivor.
The Bombay High Court dismissed a plea to quash an FIR against a disabled man accused of molesting and threatening a woman. The Court stated the case required a full trial to determine the facts.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court revised its October 18 judgment, removing a controversial remark about a rape convict being “kind enough” to leave the survivor alive while maintaining its decision to reduce the sentence to 20 years.
Police investigations reveal that a Ghaziabad gang-rape claim by a Delhi woman was fabricated due to a property dispute. Doctors found no injuries, and evidence contradicted her story.
The Kerala High Court ruled that rape allegations on a false marriage promise are invalid if the woman continued the relationship despite knowing the man was married.
A Mumbai court sentenced a man to 1.5 years in jail for harassing a minor girl by calling her “item,” ruling that such behavior outrages a woman’s modesty.
The Bombay High Court granted bail to a rape accused, ruling that the relationship was consensual. The accused must marry the survivor if she is found within a year.
The Supreme Court acquitted a man sentenced to death for a 2012 rape and murder case due to lack of evidence. The case highlights police negligence and judicial oversights, raising questions about justice in India.
The Delhi High Court ruled that a rape victim’s statement cannot be blindly treated as gospel truth. While such statements deserve importance, they must pass credibility tests to ensure justice, as shown in a recent Rewari case.
A complaint has been filed against Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, accusing him of conspiracy, misconduct, and favoring his son’s clients in a legal case. The allegations also include favoritism in vaccine policies and links with anti-national figures.