The Karnataka High Court ruled that a husband can pay money instead of offering a room in the shared house to his wife. The Court said this alternative is practical and legally valid under the Domestic Violence Act.
The Bombay High Court has ruled that a woman who leaves her matrimonial home before the divorce is finalized cannot later claim the right to reside there under the Domestic Violence Act, even if her divorce appeal is pending.
The Borivali Court dismissed a woman’s domestic violence plea, stating she cannot sue her in-laws 32 years after leaving her matrimonial home. The court emphasized the need for filing cases within a reasonable timeframe.
The Calcutta High Court has ruled that denying financial support to a wife and her minor son is considered domestic violence, even if the couple no longer lives together.
The Kerala High Court ruled that a divorced wife cannot claim residence in her ex-husband’s house as a shared household. The court upheld the eviction order, stating that she had no legal right to stay there.
The Karnataka High Court ruled that a husband can pay Rs. 5,000 as an alternative to providing a shared house to his wife, modifying an earlier trial court order.
The Delhi High Court ruled that a woman who mistreats her elderly in-laws has no right to stay in their house. The court upheld the eviction and directed the provision of alternative accommodation under the Domestic Violence Act.
The Kerala High Court has ruled that a divorced wife cannot claim residence in her former matrimonial home. The court upheld a Family Court’s order to evict her, stating that the property belongs to the ex-husband’s family, and she has no legal right to continue living there.
The Delhi High Court ruled that a woman mistreating her in-laws cannot stay in their house, emphasizing the importance of peaceful living for senior citizens. An alternative accommodation must be provided for the woman.
The Bombay High Court clarified that a woman who vacates her matrimonial home before divorce proceedings cannot assert the right to residence under the DV Act, despite any pending appeal. Discover the details of the court’s decision and its impact on matrimonial disputes.
