The Bombay High Court ruled that for an offense under Section 498A, a woman must prove continuous cruelty, quashing an FIR against elderly in-laws involved in a matrimonial dispute.
The Supreme Court ruled that individuals cannot be denied their right to travel abroad merely because they are accused in a 498-A IPC complaint. This decision reinforces the protection of personal liberty and emphasizes the importance of valid travel documentation.
The Bombay High Court ruled that continuous cruelty is required to prove an offense under Section 498A, quashing an FIR against elderly in-laws due to lack of evidence and arbitrary investigation.
