The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that in matrimonial cases, the husband’s convenience takes priority when he has custody of minor children. The court directed the husband to bear the wife’s travel expenses to attend court proceedings.
The MP High Court highlighted the importance of mutual adjustment in marriage while resolving a dispute where a wife appealed against a decree for Restitution of Conjugal Rights. The couple expressed their willingness to reconcile, leading to a significant decision upholding marital harmony.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court clarified that directing a husband to submit his salary slip in a maintenance case is not a violation of privacy or constitutional rights. It helps determine fair maintenance for the wife and children.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court quashed an FIR filed under Section 498A IPC, stating it was lodged to harass and pressurize the in-laws. The court found the allegations baseless and dismissed the case.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that maintenance claims under Section 125 CrPC must be filed where parties permanently reside, not where they make temporary or casual visits.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has urged the central government to reduce the age of sexual consent from 18 to 16, stating that the current law has led to injustice for adolescent boys. The court raised concerns over cases where consensual relationships are treated as criminal due to the law.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently ruled that family members cannot be held liable in dowry cases unless there is clear evidence of their active involvement. Casual mention of their names in the FIR does not justify legal action against them.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that when a husband has custody of minor children, his convenience should be prioritized in matrimonial cases. The Court rejected the wife’s request to transfer the case, ensuring the husband’s responsibility for travel expenses.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court emphasized that married couples should live together with a sense of adjustment, upholding a decree for Restitution of Conjugal Rights in favor of the husband.
The MP High Court ruled that maintenance claims under Section 125 CrPC must be filed where the parties reside, not where they make brief visits. Learn more about this important legal decision.
