The Bombay High Court ruled that a wife cannot prevent her husband from selling a flat if he offers similar alternative housing. The court upheld the family court’s decision, balancing the rights of both parties.
The Kerala High Court has ruled that a divorced wife cannot claim residence in her former matrimonial home. The court upheld a Family Court’s order to evict her, stating that the property belongs to the ex-husband’s family, and she has no legal right to continue living there.
The Bombay High Court ruled that a wife cannot block the sale of her husband’s flat if he offers similar alternative accommodation. The court emphasized that the wife’s lifestyle must be maintained, but she cannot refuse reasonable housing alternatives.
A Borivali Court ruling has denied a woman’s plea under the Domestic Violence Act, stating that a lawsuit cannot be filed 32 years after the relationship ended, as it exceeds a reasonable time frame for legal action.
The Madras High Court ruled that removing the husband from the home may be necessary to maintain domestic peace in cases of harassment. The Court emphasized that Family Courts should not hesitate to pass such orders, even if the husband has no alternative housing.
The Delhi High Court ruled that a woman mistreating her in-laws has no right to live in their house, emphasizing that elderly parents deserve a peaceful living environment.
After a failed Rs 13 lakh settlement, a daughter-in-law forcibly re-enters her in-laws’ home, sparking a family dispute filled with accusations of false cases and money demands.
The Bombay High Court clarified that a woman who vacates her matrimonial home before divorce proceedings cannot assert the right to residence under the DV Act, despite any pending appeal. Discover the details of the court’s decision and its impact on matrimonial disputes.
The Orissa High Court ruled that a case under Section 498A of the IPC can be filed where a wife lives after leaving the matrimonial home due to cruelty. This decision reaffirms that mental torture experienced at her current residence is valid grounds for jurisdiction.
The Bombay High Court ruled that a wife cannot prevent her husband from selling their flat if he offers similar alternative accommodation nearby. The court dismissed the wife’s petition, highlighting balanced rights for both parties.
