The Supreme Court ruled that individuals cannot be denied their right to travel abroad merely because they are accused in a 498-A IPC complaint. This decision reinforces the protection of personal liberty and emphasizes the importance of valid travel documentation.
The Allahabad High Court criticized the wife’s parents for attending mediation sessions only to collect money deposited by the husband, emphasizing the need for genuine dispute resolution.
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that no arrests or coercive actions should be taken for two months after an FIR is registered under Section 498A of the IPC. This decision aims to prevent the misuse of the law and allows time for mediation through Family Welfare Committees.
The Delhi High Court stressed the need for strict action against false cases filed against husbands to prevent misuse of the legal system and protect the social fabric.
The Telangana High Court has ruled that false accusations against a husband’s relatives in matrimonial disputes, if left unchecked, can result in the misuse of the legal process. The court emphasized the need for specific evidence to support such claims.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court quashed a divorce decree, ruling that minor differences between spouses do not constitute cruelty. Discover the details of this significant case.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 377 IPC after the husband paid Rs. 74 lakhs as a final settlement to his wife. This decision resolved all matrimonial disputes between the couple.
The Supreme Court of India has quashed criminal proceedings against a man after an amicable settlement of matrimonial disputes, highlighting the court’s power to ensure justice through such actions.
The Delhi High Court emphasized the need to curb the misuse of rape charges in matrimonial cases. The court quashed an FIR against a husband and his family, highlighting the issue of false allegations and subsequent settlements.
The Delhi High Court has highlighted the growing misuse of Section 498A, where all relatives of the husband are implicated in dowry harassment cases. The court ordered the appointment of a petitioner as a sub-inspector despite an FIR against him.
