The Punjab & Haryana High Court ruled that a wife cannot be denied maintenance simply because she is qualified, unless it is proven she quit her job to seek support. Both the husband’s challenge and the wife’s request for more maintenance were rejected.
The Kerala High Court emphasized that family courts must establish clear time frames for case disposal when a party requests timely resolution, ensuring swift justice in family disputes.
The Bombay High Court ruled that a wife cannot block the sale of her husband’s flat if he offers similar alternative accommodation. The court emphasized that the wife’s lifestyle must be maintained, but she cannot refuse reasonable housing alternatives.
The Delhi High Court upheld a family court decision permitting a mother to take her child to Malaysia for nine days, rejecting the father’s plea over concerns of flight risk and previous non-compliance.
The Karnataka High Court has doubled the interim maintenance for a stay-at-home wife from ₹18,000 to ₹36,000. The court recognized the extensive responsibilities of childcare and dismissed the husband’s claims that his wife was lazy, emphasizing that taking care of children is a full-time job.
The Delhi High Court upheld a family court’s decision allowing a mother to take her child to Malaysia for nine days, emphasizing the child’s welfare despite the father’s objections.
The Madras High Court has ruled that removing the husband from the matrimonial home may be necessary for ensuring domestic peace, regardless of whether he has alternative accommodation. This decision underscores the court’s stance on protecting the well-being of families in contentious situations.
The Bombay High Court ruled that a wife cannot prevent her husband from selling their flat if he offers similar alternative accommodation nearby. The court dismissed the wife’s petition, highlighting balanced rights for both parties.
The Calcutta High Court recently affirmed that a man can seek a divorce if his wife forces him to live apart from his parents without valid reasons. This ruling sheds light on marital disputes and the importance of family values in Indian culture.
