Kerala High Court: False Allegations of Sexual Assault by Women Are Possible
Kerala High Court: Women Can Make False Sexual Assault Claims The Kerala High Court has said that it is possible…
Kerala High Court: Women Can Make False Sexual Assault Claims The Kerala High Court has said that it is possible…
A Delhi court has ordered an FIR against a woman and her father for filing false gang rape and cruelty charges against her husband and in-laws. The court also acquitted the accused family members.
The Allahabad High Court granted bail to two rape accused, stating that false allegations in sexual offence cases are on the rise. The court noted that Indian society has changed significantly in recent years.
The Kerala High Court ruled that rape allegations on a false marriage promise are invalid if the woman continued the relationship despite knowing the man was married.
The Delhi High Court ruled that a rape victim’s statement cannot be blindly treated as gospel truth. While such statements deserve importance, they must pass credibility tests to ensure justice, as shown in a recent Rewari case.
A woman in Hailakandi, Assam, has been sent to judicial custody for filing a false rape FIR. The court found the allegations fabricated and emphasized the misuse of the legal system as a serious issue, sending a strong warning to those who abuse judicial processes.
Young athlete Rahul, preparing for the Olympics, died by suicide after battling depression caused by false rape charges. His heartbreaking story has sparked calls for justice and mental health awareness.
A Delhi court acquitted a man after six years in a false rape case, citing unreliable witness statements and evidence proving a consensual relationship between the accused and the woman.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court quashed a rape case filed after 18 years by a ‘second wife,’ citing false allegations and an attempt to pressure the accused for financial benefits.
The Delhi High Court recently quashed a rape FIR against a man, highlighting the misuse of Section 376 IPC. The court ruled that the case was an example of how the provision, meant to protect women, is sometimes misused to harass men unnecessarily.