The Allahabad High Court denied protection to a live-in couple on the grounds that the woman was already married and their cohabitation period was short. The court stressed that the petition sought to legitimize an illegal relationship.
The Madras High Court directed a woman to treat her estranged husband with respect and kindness during visits with their child, emphasizing the Indian principle “Atithi Devo Bhava” to ensure the child’s well-being and happiness.
Union Minister Kiren Rijiju has called on all states to establish family courts in every district with a population over 10 lakh, emphasizing the need for sensitive handling of family matters. He provided current data on family courts and discussed plans to use technology and mediation to speed up case resolutions.
The Calcutta High Court showed leniency towards a wife by transferring her divorce case from Coochebehar to Siliguri, acknowledging her physical and financial hardships.
The Supreme Court ruled that a mother, as the natural guardian, can choose her child’s surname after remarrying. This decision emphasizes the child’s well-being and identity.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that in matrimonial cases, the husband’s convenience should be prioritized if he has custody of the minor children, ensuring he isn’t forced to attend proceedings far from his residence.
The Delhi High Court ruled that rejecting a maintenance application in a divorce case doesn’t prevent a wife from seeking maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, emphasizing her rights despite divorce proceedings.
A Mumbai woman faces legal action for posting her ex-partner’s obscene pictures on his daughter’s school website. The court denied her bail, emphasizing the trauma caused to the child.
The Bombay High Court has ruled that a wife must pay maintenance to her ex-husband under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. This decision emphasizes the applicability of alimony provisions regardless of the divorce decree.
The Madras High Court has ruled that removing the husband from the matrimonial home may be necessary for ensuring domestic peace, regardless of whether he has alternative accommodation. This decision underscores the court’s stance on protecting the well-being of families in contentious situations.
