We at indianman.in provide legal services and handle cases from end to end. You will be completely updated with the proceedings, and our experienced team of lawyers will give their best services.
We at indianman.in provide complete legal services, handling cases from end to end. You will be fully updated with every proceeding, and our experienced team of lawyers will give their best services.
The Chhattisgarh High Court has upheld a divorce granted to a man after his wife insulted him as “paaltu chuha” and pressured him to abandon his parents. The Court ruled this behavior as mental cruelty and awarded ₹5 lakh permanent alimony to the wife.
The Supreme Court has revived Allahabad High Court’s guidelines on Section 498A IPC, ruling that no arrests can be made within the first two months of filing a complaint. The Court said this cooling-off period will help families seek reconciliation and prevent misuse of the law.
The Supreme Court criticized a woman’s ₹12 crore alimony demand, noting that her marriage lasted only 18 months and stressing that educated spouses should work and not depend on handouts.
The Bombay High Court ruled that denying intimacy and making false accusations against a husband amounts to cruelty, upholding a family court order that granted divorce after the couple lived apart for over a decade.
The Chhattisgarh High Court held that a husband cannot demand his wife’s call records or private details, ruling that marriage does not override the fundamental right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution.
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a wife living separately from her husband without a valid reason is not entitled to maintenance under Section 125(4) CrPC, setting aside a family court’s order and directing a fresh hearing.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that a husband cannot escape paying maintenance by citing financial burdens. Instead, he must earn more to support his wife and minor children.
The Bombay High Court upheld a ₹15,000 monthly maintenance order in favor of a working wife, ruling that employment does not bar her right to live with the same standard of living she had in her matrimonial home.
